

Manjaro Linux
327 likes
Manjaro is a user-friendly Linux distribution based on the independently developed Arch operating system. Within the Linux community, Arch itself is renowned for being an exceptionally fast, powerful, and lightweight distribution that provides access to the very latest cutting...
License model
- Free • Open Source
Application types
Platforms
- Linux
- Arch Linux
Features
Manjaro Linux News & Activities
Highlights • All activities
Recent News
- POX published news article about Manjaro LinuxManjaro 24.2 Yonada released with Linux kernel 6.12, GNOME 47, KDE Plasma 6.2, & Xfce 4.18
Manjaro has announced the release of version 24.2, code-named “Yonada”, for its Arch-based Linux di...
- Maoholguin published news article about Manjaro LinuxManjaro Linux introduces Immutable version for community testing
Manjaro Linux has entered the initial testing phase for its new Manjaro Immutable version, utilizin...
- POX published news article about Manjaro LinuxManjaro 24.0 “Wynsdey” released with GNOME 46 and KDE Plasma 6, based on Linux kernel 6.9
Manjaro, a popular Arch-based Linux distribution, has launched its 24.0 version, “Wynsdey”, built o...
Recent activities
- gramblo353 liked Manjaro Linux
- aliriza-keskin23 added Manjaro Linux as alternative to Turkman Linux
- Alaik reviewed Manjaro Linux
Used to come with proprietary Vivaldi at some point, very untrustworthy
- cpfotiadis added Manjaro Linux as alternative to RebeccaBlackOS
- cpfotiadis added Manjaro Linux as alternative to Siduction
Comments and Reviews
AUR probably has the biggest selection of newest software today. The classic distro to use if you want to have access to this, is of course, Arch. But Arch is a pain to setup. Not so much to install - if you follow the install guide to the letter you can get Arch working pretty easily. The problem is what happens after. The guide will walk you through getting a basic GUI set up, for instance, but you might have all sorts of weird issues like flicker or mismatched fonts that will have you going down Google rabbit holes for days. A lot of things, like video drivers, break a lot and are hopelessly complex, troubleshooting that stuff is no fun at all. And at some point, you get sick of the mandatory crash course in obscure configuration, implementation details and bugs of every piece of software you have, and just want to have a working system and work on your own work, and not the system.
Manjaro lets you do that. The installer is helpful, and will actually set up an Arch system with a few bells and whistles at the level a reasonably advanced Arch user would. It doesn't do a perfect job, and there's probably Arch users out there that could install Arch better manually than the Manjaro installer. But as a novice user, as I said you can follow the wiki and get a working system. But if you want to customize it to your needs, the learning curve will be very steep and you will probably have to live with a system that is broken in a bunch of small ways for months or even years. With Manjaro you don't have to - it will certainly do a better job than a newbie following the wiki for the first time, no reading required. One could argue that a person uninterested in reading the Arch wiki shouldn't use Arch-based distros. Well... The other distros kind of suck, and the newbie distros (Mint, Ubuntu) are bloated messes. Manjaro is a pretty good compromise between not being a bloated mess and working out of the box. Your Manjaro install will probably have some problem or other (welcome to Linux, lol), and they might be problems you wouldn't have had in Arch. But in Arch you would have other problems (the ones that Manjaro solves), unless you know Linux quite well. If you knew Linux quite well, you wouldn't be reading a review about Manjaro to decide if you should use it, so I'll assume you don't, in which case, I absolutely recommend trying Manjaro! Maybe give Arch a shot first just to understand what the real deal is supposed to be like, play with it for a few days, get frustrated trying to fix everything. Then wipe that and install Manjaro - you'll get an instant feeling of relief.
There are two downsides with Manjaro and they have to do with the community and its origins in Arch. Manjaro is basically Arch with a fancy installer, some themes, a handful of additional packages (like a utility to switch kernels easily and a pacman GUI). There's very little difference and 99% of what you read on Arch wiki will apply, except that you'd only need to read it 10% as often because usually Manjaro just works to begin with. A few things will not apply, for example the kernels used by Manjaro are I think slightly different. Despite this, anytime you seek help all the Arch people will tell you to get lost because "Manjaro is not Arch". It is hard to objectively describe to someone who hasn't experienced it, but the Arch community is a bit abrasive to begin with, and they have a bizarre enmity to Manjaro users. Obviously if you were very knowledgeable, you would use Arch, not Manjaro, so all the experts are Arch users - but even though Manjaro is currently #2 on distrowatch vs. Arch on #16, Arch users constantly try to marginalize and exclude Manjaro users from any online help community. So something you will learn quickly is to lie about using Manjaro when asking for help. As I said, 99% of the time it won't matter, and the 1% you just have to learn (it's really not such an unpredictable thing as the anti-Manjaro Arch users will make it sound).
The other issue with Manjaro is that Arch is a rolling release OS. You get the latest version of every software, and the Arch position is that you're supposed to update everything on your system, even AUR packages (and you will have a lot of AUR packages because the repo has fuck all) every day, sometimes multiple times a day. This can take a lot of time and is a pain in the ass. A sensible person would recognize that, probably not much changed between puppyfartsoundboard v1.32.7.8cf and v1.32.7.8cg and there's no need to keep it on the bleeding edge - in fact, you only really want the security updates for a handful of critical systems. For everything else, the vast majority of updates will add little or no values for the user. Yet Arch requires you to spend time doing it over and over. You can't even update only important software because in Arch, partial upgrades are not supported. You can do them no problem - I have for years and it's fine, nothing breaks. In fact it will break less because occasionally Arch updates themselves will break. The Russian roulette at every update is part of The Arch Way, and every time you run pacman -Syu you basically have no idea if it will be fine or if you'll spend an hour figuring out how to even get your DE back up. So you are actually better off updating as little as possible, but if you do and something does break, good luck getting help. Without fail, a bunch of Arch users will show up (even though Manjaro Is Not Arch) and lecture you on how partial upgrades are bad, and then leave without solving your problem.
On the topic of packages, nice as AUR is it actually has a major security flaw. It's not a flaw of the system per se. But AUR packages are installed by running scripts which can do very bad things to your system. This was obviously first set up for Arch and the expectation from an Arch user is to read and audit every script. Sometimes these scripts will download and run other scripts. Most will be written in bash (yuk!). You will typically get 50-1000 lines. They will not be the tidiest code ever. So here's what will happen in practice: Unless you know bash very well, it will take an hour or more to read all that code, not to mention looking up syntax you don't know or actually verifying if it does what you think it does for less obvious lines. You will not do this every time you need to install something from AUR. You will train yourself to blindly trust hundreds of scripts from strangers on the internet. If these scripts have malware, oops! So you can take this in two ways: Either installing every AUR package (don't forget dependencies!) takes hours because you need to closely check the install script, or it is horrendously unsafe because you're not just blindly accepting everything. I would guess 90% of Arch users are the latter, but, pick your poison.
So if you can put up with these proiblems, Manjaro is actually a great system. There is an additional flaw in that it uses systemd, but there are precious few realistic alternatives that don't. Other than these, it basically has no issues. Probably one of the best daily driver desktop distros (hell, OSes) available right now.
Used to come with proprietary Vivaldi at some point, very untrustworthy
Manjaro is free if your time is worthless... It's unstable and a disappointment for an Arch based GNU/Linux Distro, if you want to use something similar and better, please use EndeavourOS.
Manjaro is based on Arch Linux, which is generally considered one of the more challenging Linux distributions. And yet, Manjaro has been making Arch Linux easy and proves it's the best of all the Arch clones and the best Windows alternative for the masses.
Works on every device. Installation is straightforward. It's fast. The community is helpful. Because it's based on Arch one obviously benefits from the massive Arch Wiki; it's rare to encounter a problem that cannot be fixed by reading the wiki. My longest running distro installation to date I think.
This was my first serious Linux and I still use it. It had everything I needed as a beginner, and everything I need as a medium-advanced user today. There is a helpful community on the forums, and since it is based on Arch, the legendary arch wiki can also be of much help.
Manjaro is good with updates!