foobar2000 Alternatives for Linux

foobar2000 is not available for Linux but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Linux with similar functionality. The best Linux alternative is Clementine, which is both free and Open Source. If that doesn't suit you, our users have ranked more than 100 alternatives to foobar2000 and loads of them are available for Linux so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement. Other interesting Linux alternatives to foobar2000 are Strawberry, DeaDBeeF, Audacious and Rhythmbox.

foobar2000 alternatives are mainly Audio Players but may also be Media Players or Internet Radio Services. Filter by these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of foobar2000.

This page was last updated

foobar2000

1447

Free • Proprietary
Audio Player

Mac
Windows
Android
iPhone
Android Tablet
iPad

foobar2000 is an advanced multi-platform freeware audio player.

Learn more about foobar2000

Clementine
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Internet Radio Service
Podcast Player
Mac
Windows
Linux
BSD
232 alternatives to Clementine
Clementine is a cross-platform free and open source music player and library organizer. It is a port of Amarok 1.4 to the Qt 4 framework and the GStreamer multimedia framework, focusing on a fast and easy-to-use interface for searching and...
Suggest and vote on features
Clementine Features
1. LightweightClementine consumes less device resources compared to similar apps.
2. Lossless AudioClementine has lossless audio support, basically studio quality sound.
Smart playlists
Dynamic/Intelligent Playlists
Integrated Last.fm scrobbler
Playlists management
Audio Visualization
Podcast Subscription
Moodbar
Ratings
Music Library
Built-in Tag editor
Clementine vs foobar2000 opinions
Almost everyone thinks Clementine is a great alternative to foobar2000.
Guest
It's free, it has a lot of features, but it is not as good as foobar2000. bug: memory leak.
Top positive comment•
10

Guest
Remote player control from Android
Top positive comment•
4

Guest
Clementine is just a basic audio player, whereas foobar2000 is a very advanced player.
Top negative comment•
0

mrdaltro
It's not well maintained, so... Expect encoders and decoders to be a lot obsolete, specially if you use Windows and the common static libraries! Also, you can expect a lot of online service libraries to not work very well. See Strawberry instead.
Negative comment•
0

Guest
Lots of design, little contents
Negative comment•
-7
Strawberry
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Audio Converter
Windows
Linux
BSD
Haiku
222 alternatives to Strawberry
Strawberry is a music player and music collection organizer. It is a fork of Clementine released in 2018 aimed at music collectors and audiophiles. The name is inspired by the band Strawbs. It's written in C++ using the Qt framework.
Suggest and vote on features
Strawberry Features
1. LightweightStrawberry consumes less device resources compared to similar apps.
2. Lossless AudioStrawberry has lossless audio support, basically studio quality sound.
3. No registration requiredYou can use most of the features in Strawberry without registration.
4. Ad-freeStrawberry doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
5. Privacy focusedStrawberry is considered a privacy friendly alternative.
6. Goal Setting Strawberry can set individual or group goals to meet over a particular period.
7. Works OfflineStrawberry can be used without the need to connect to the internet.
Music Library
Music collection
Customizable
Automatic Lyrics Finder
Auto fetch album covers
Playlists management
Gapless Playback
Integrated Last.fm scrobbler
Automatic album art download
ListenBrainz scrobbling
Strawberry vs foobar2000 opinions
Guest
Strawberry has many features that are similar to the ones I use most in foobar2000. I particularly like the queuing system as it allows me to maintain my playlists in the order I want while easily being able to cherry pick what I want to listen to right now. This is the best music player I have found that is available for Linux and it gets me closest to the experience I loved about using foobar2000 in Windows.
Positive comment•
0
DeaDBeeF
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Audio Converter
Mac
Windows
Linux
BSD
KDE
Cinnamon
GNOME
MATE
Xfce
155 alternatives to DeaDBeeF
DeaDBeeF is a lightweight graphical music player created for easy playback of music and management of playlists. It supports major audio codecs and tags, global hotkeys, gapless playback, streaming audio, command line control, and has an 18-band equalizer.
Suggest and vote on features
DeaDBeeF Features
1. LightweightDeaDBeeF consumes less device resources compared to similar apps.
2. Extensible by Plugins/ExtensionsDeaDBeeF can be extended with add-ons, plugins and extensions.
3. PortableDeaDBeeF can be used from a USB stick or similar with no prior installation.
4. Command line interfaceDeaDBeeF either have CLI support or is a CLI-only app.
5. Lossless AudioDeaDBeeF has lossless audio support, basically studio quality sound.
6. Works OfflineDeaDBeeF can be used without the need to connect to the internet.
7. Ad-freeDeaDBeeF doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
Fully customizable interface
Replay Gain
Playlists management
Support for Hotkeys
Mods
DeaDBeeF vs foobar2000 opinions
Most users think DeaDBeeF is a great alternative to foobar2000.
all • positive • negative relevance • date
onkoe
Very customizable, with a default GTK interface! Looks and runs great! Exactly what I wanted from a music player :)
Top positive comment•
0

Guest
Interface is very similar. Only the the animation is missing, but that's not why I used foobar in the first place.
Top positive comment•
1

23C5DA
Very similar to foobar2000 but lacks a lot of refinements and details. Some hotkeys binding simply doesn't work. Cannot import/export theme and settings.
Comment•
1

bVork
The only Linux audio player that's as simple, compatible, and customizable as foobar2000.
Positive comment•
1

Guest
Looks 99% like foobar2000, as a previous foobar2000 user. UI is almost exactly the same, never crashes, uses very little memory.
Positive comment•
0

Show more comments ▾
5 of 6 comments
Audacious
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Internet Radio Service
Windows
Linux
BSD
Haiku
Xfce
Mac
121 alternatives to Audacious
Audacious is an advanced audio player. It is free, lightweight, based on GTK+, runs on Linux and many other *nix platforms and is focused on audio quality and supporting a wide range of audio codecs. There is also support for several visual styles from Winamp.
Suggest and vote on features
Audacious Features
1. LightweightAudacious consumes less device resources compared to similar apps.
2. Extensible by Plugins/ExtensionsAudacious can be extended with add-ons, plugins and extensions.
3. Dark ModeAudacious supports dark mode for comfortable usage in low light conditions.
4. No TrackingAudacious will not track you or use your personal data.
5. Ad-freeAudacious doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
6. Lossless AudioAudacious has lossless audio support, basically studio quality sound.
7. PortableAudacious can be used from a USB stick or similar with no prior installation.
8. Works OfflineAudacious can be used without the need to connect to the internet.
Windows Compatible
Create Playlist
Music Library
Supports audio media keys
3D visualization
Queued Operations
Playlists management
Global hotkey
Dynamic Range Compressor
Skinnable
Audacious vs foobar2000 opinions
Almost everyone thinks Audacious is a great alternative to foobar2000.
RA
It's open source, runs on Linux and Windows, has an intuitive UI and just works without any unexpected shortcomings.
Top positive comment•
0

Guest
If you are looking for a Linux program to do the same thing foobar2000 does, this is probably your best bet. Has a gui very reminiscent of fb2k, a similar plugin system bundled with it, and support for almost all video game music formats out of the box.
Top positive comment•
4

Unk42
Very similar to foobar2000 minimalistic interface. There is also support for Winamp skins + its a open source software.
Positive comment•
1

Guest
Poor audio settings and useless/featureless gui.
Negative comment•
-9

Guest
gapless playback work perfectly :) bothing worse than those short pauses!

if this had a remote function would be awesome

the only thing i dont like is not being able to navigate to the folder from the context menu
Positive comment•
1
Rhythmbox
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Internet Radio Service
CD Ripper
Linux
BSD
Flathub
Flatpak
139 alternatives to Rhythmbox
Rhythmbox is an audio player for Linux that plays and organizes digital music. Inspired by Apple's iTunes, it is free software that is designed to work well under the .
Suggest and vote on features
Rhythmbox Features
1. LightweightRhythmbox consumes less device resources compared to similar apps.
Crossfading
Spotify integration
iPhone/iPod sync
Rhythmbox vs foobar2000 opinions
Most users think Rhythmbox is a great alternative to foobar2000.
mrdaltro
Lacks library features, lacks more DSP options, lacks scrobbling, lacks audio converter, output selection...
Negative comment•
0

Guest
Lacks the library features, as well as the modular approach to the interface.
Negative comment•
3
Quod Libet
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Media Player
Mac
Windows
Linux
Debian
Xfce
153 alternatives to Quod Libet
Quod Libet is a Gapless GTK+-based audio player written in Python. Its designed around the idea that you know how to organize your music better than we do. It lets you make playlists based on regular expressions (dont worry, regular searches work too).
Suggest and vote on features
Quod Libet Features
1. Extensible by Plugins/ExtensionsQuod Libet can be extended with add-ons, plugins and extensions.
2. PortableQuod Libet can be used from a USB stick or similar with no prior installation.
Library Management
Customization
Tagging
Waveform Seekbar
Media library
Music Library
Columnar-panel navigation
Built-in Tag editor
SoundCloud Integration
Musicbrainz support
Quod Libet vs foobar2000 opinions
Most users think Quod Libet is a great alternative to foobar2000.
Apple Music
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Paid • Proprietary
Music Streaming Service
Audio Player
Internet Radio Service
Mac
Windows
Linux
Online
Android
iPhone
iPad
Apple Watch
Xbox
117 alternatives to Apple Music
To bring you more music than ever with access to millions of songs. To give you personal recommendations from people who know and love music. To deepen the connection between artists and fans. To reimagine radio with a 24/7, global station.
Suggest and vote on features
Apple Music Features
1. Lossless AudioApple Music has lossless audio support, basically studio quality sound.
2. PortableApple Music can be used from a USB stick or similar with no prior installation.
3. Music StoreYou can buy music and keep ownership in perpetuity at Apple Music.
4. Personalized RecommendationsApple Music can recommend content you like, whether it's something you already know or not.
5. Cloud SyncSync your data (notes, documents, bookmarks, etc.) across your different devices and to the cloud.
6. AirPlay SupportApple Music can stream or share content to your Mac, Apple TV, or compatible smart TV.
Streaming
Apple Music vs foobar2000 opinions
pros, cons and recent comments
mrdaltro
Apple Music is a streaming service; foobar2000 is just "agnostic" music player that CAN play streaming, if configured to.
Comment•
0
Amarok
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Media Player
Windows
Linux
BSD
158 alternatives to Amarok
Amarok is a powerful music player for Linux, Unix and Windows with an intuitive interface. It makes playing the music you love and discovering new music easier than ever before - and it looks good doing it!
Suggest and vote on features
Amarok Features
1. Ad-freeAmarok doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
2. Dark ModeAmarok supports dark mode for comfortable usage in low light conditions.
3. Privacy focusedAmarok is considered a privacy friendly alternative.
4. Support for scriptingAmarok supports scripts and macros to automate or customize tasks.
Library Management
Integrated Last.fm scrobbler
Podcast Subscription
Music Library
Multiple languages
Amarok vs foobar2000 opinions
Some users think Amarok is a great alternative to foobar2000, some don't.
Guest
I have not seen a better yet still good-looking software than Amarok.
Positive comment•
1

Guest
Meant for power users. Has global shortcuts, replay gain and a ton of features.
Positive comment•
0
Dopamine
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Mac
Windows
Linux
54 alternatives to Dopamine
Dopamine is an audio player which tries to make organizing and listening to music as simple and pretty as possible. It can play wav, mp3, ogg vorbis, flac, wma and m4a/aac.
Suggest and vote on features
Dopamine Features
1. Dark ModeDopamine supports dark mode for comfortable usage in low light conditions.
2. Ad-freeDopamine doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
Clean design
Music Library
Theme Customization
Integrated Last.fm scrobbler
Lyrics
Automatic Lyrics Finder
WASAPI Output
Auto fetch album covers
Dopamine vs foobar2000 opinions
Most users think Dopamine is a great alternative to foobar2000.
Elisa
Do you think this is a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Audio Player
Internet Radio Service
Windows
Linux
49 alternatives to Elisa
Elisa is a music player developed by the KDE community that strives to be simple and nice to use. We also recognize that we need a flexible product to account for the different workflows and use-cases of our users.
Suggest and vote on features
Elisa Features
1. LightweightElisa consumes less device resources compared to similar apps.
2. Ad-freeElisa doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
Music Library
Playlists