foobar2000 Alternatives for Linux
foobar2000 is not available for Linux but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Linux with similar functionality. The best Linux alternative is Clementine, which is both free and Open Source. If that doesn't suit you, our users have ranked more than 100 alternatives to foobar2000 and loads of them are available for Linux so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement. Other interesting Linux alternatives to foobar2000 are Strawberry, DeaDBeeF, Audacious and Rhythmbox.
foobar2000 alternatives are mainly Audio Players but may also be Media Players or Internet Radio Services. Filter by these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of foobar2000.Clementine
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Internet Radio Service
- Podcast Player
232 alternatives to Clementine- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- BSD
Clementine is a cross-platform free and open source music player and library organizer. It is a port of Amarok 1.4 to the Qt 4 framework and the GStreamer multimedia framework, focusing on a fast and easy-to-use interface for searching and...
Clementine Features
Clementine vs foobar2000 opinions
It's free, it has a lot of features, but it is not as good as foobar2000. bug: memory leak.
10Remote player control from Android
4Clementine is just a basic audio player, whereas foobar2000 is a very advanced player.
0mrdaltroIt's not well maintained, so... Expect encoders and decoders to be a lot obsolete, specially if you use Windows and the common static libraries! Also, you can expect a lot of online service libraries to not work very well. See Strawberry instead.
0Lots of design, little contents
-7Strawberry
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Audio Converter
222 alternatives to Strawberry- Windows
- Linux
- BSD
- Haiku
Strawberry is a music player and music collection organizer. It is a fork of Clementine released in 2018 aimed at music collectors and audiophiles. The name is inspired by the band Strawbs. It's written in C++ using the Qt framework.
Strawberry Features
Strawberry vs foobar2000 opinions
Strawberry has many features that are similar to the ones I use most in foobar2000. I particularly like the queuing system as it allows me to maintain my playlists in the order I want while easily being able to cherry pick what I want to listen to right now. This is the best music player I have found that is available for Linux and it gets me closest to the experience I loved about using foobar2000 in Windows.
0DeaDBeeF
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Audio Converter
155 alternatives to DeaDBeeF- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- BSD
- KDE
- Cinnamon
- GNOME
- MATE
- Xfce
DeaDBeeF is a lightweight graphical music player created for easy playback of music and management of playlists. It supports major audio codecs and tags, global hotkeys, gapless playback, streaming audio, command line control, and has an 18-band equalizer.
DeaDBeeF Features
DeaDBeeF vs foobar2000 opinions
onkoeVery customizable, with a default GTK interface! Looks and runs great! Exactly what I wanted from a music player :)
0Interface is very similar. Only the the animation is missing, but that's not why I used foobar in the first place.
123C5DAVery similar to foobar2000 but lacks a lot of refinements and details. Some hotkeys binding simply doesn't work. Cannot import/export theme and settings.
1bVorkThe only Linux audio player that's as simple, compatible, and customizable as foobar2000.
1Looks 99% like foobar2000, as a previous foobar2000 user. UI is almost exactly the same, never crashes, uses very little memory.
0Audacious
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Internet Radio Service
121 alternatives to Audacious- Windows
- Linux
- BSD
- Haiku
- Xfce
- Mac
Audacious is an advanced audio player. It is free, lightweight, based on GTK+, runs on Linux and many other *nix platforms and is focused on audio quality and supporting a wide range of audio codecs. There is also support for several visual styles from Winamp.
Audacious Features
Audacious vs foobar2000 opinions
RAIt's open source, runs on Linux and Windows, has an intuitive UI and just works without any unexpected shortcomings.
0If you are looking for a Linux program to do the same thing foobar2000 does, this is probably your best bet. Has a gui very reminiscent of fb2k, a similar plugin system bundled with it, and support for almost all video game music formats out of the box.
4Unk42Very similar to foobar2000 minimalistic interface. There is also support for Winamp skins + its a open source software.
1Poor audio settings and useless/featureless gui.
-9gapless playback work perfectly :) bothing worse than those short pauses!
if this had a remote function would be awesome
the only thing i dont like is not being able to navigate to the folder from the context menu
1Rhythmbox
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Internet Radio Service
- CD Ripper
139 alternatives to Rhythmbox- Linux
- BSD
- Flathub
- Flatpak
Rhythmbox is an audio player for Linux that plays and organizes digital music. Inspired by Apple's iTunes, it is free software that is designed to work well under the .
Rhythmbox Features
Rhythmbox vs foobar2000 opinions
mrdaltroLacks library features, lacks more DSP options, lacks scrobbling, lacks audio converter, output selection...
0Lacks the library features, as well as the modular approach to the interface.
3Quod Libet
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Media Player
153 alternatives to Quod Libet- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Debian
- Xfce
Quod Libet is a Gapless GTK+-based audio player written in Python. Its designed around the idea that you know how to organize your music better than we do. It lets you make playlists based on regular expressions (dont worry, regular searches work too).
Quod Libet Features
Quod Libet vs foobar2000 opinions
Apple Music
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Paid • Proprietary
- Music Streaming Service
- Audio Player
- Internet Radio Service
117 alternatives to Apple Music- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Online
- Android
- iPhone
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Xbox
To bring you more music than ever with access to millions of songs. To give you personal recommendations from people who know and love music. To deepen the connection between artists and fans. To reimagine radio with a 24/7, global station.
Apple Music Features
Apple Music vs foobar2000 opinions
mrdaltroApple Music is a streaming service; foobar2000 is just "agnostic" music player that CAN play streaming, if configured to.
0Amarok
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Media Player
158 alternatives to Amarok- Windows
- Linux
- BSD
Amarok is a powerful music player for Linux, Unix and Windows with an intuitive interface. It makes playing the music you love and discovering new music easier than ever before - and it looks good doing it!
Amarok Features
Amarok vs foobar2000 opinions
I have not seen a better yet still good-looking software than Amarok.
1Meant for power users. Has global shortcuts, replay gain and a ton of features.
0Dopamine
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
54 alternatives to Dopamine- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
Dopamine is an audio player which tries to make organizing and listening to music as simple and pretty as possible. It can play wav, mp3, ogg vorbis, flac, wma and m4a/aac.
Dopamine Features
Dopamine vs foobar2000 opinions
Elisa
Do you think this is a good alternative?YesNo- Free • Open Source
- Audio Player
- Internet Radio Service
49 alternatives to Elisa- Windows
- Linux
Elisa is a music player developed by the KDE community that strives to be simple and nice to use. We also recognize that we need a flexible product to account for the different workflows and use-cases of our users.
Elisa Features