Adobe faces backlash over new Photoshop TOS granting unlimited access to user projects
Adobe's recently discovered update to Adobe Photoshop Terms of Service (TOS) has sparked significant concern among professionals on social media, since it has been revealed that the new TOS mandates that users grant Adobe unlimited access to their active projects for "content moderation" and other purposes. This includes projects under NDA, spanning unannounced games, movies, and other media.
Adobe's access encompasses both automated and manual methods of content analysis. The company may employ machine learning to scrutinize user creations, leading to suspicions that Adobe aims to train its AI models with user-generated content. This aligns with Adobe's increasing focus on generative AI, highlighted by initiatives like Adobe Firefly.
It's worth noting that it seems the updated TOS primarily impacts projects stored in the cloud, leaving locally saved projects unaffected. Despite considerable backlash, Adobe has not commented on or revised the TOS since the changes were made in February 2024. Speculation suggests Adobe might be adopting a wait-and-see approach to the public outcry.
Our take: If you're looking for a perhaps less invasive alternative to Photoshop, you can always turn to the excellent Affinity Photo or the open-source GIMP, as well as hundreds of other alternatives that we have listed here.


Comments
The affinity link is broken
Fixed. Thanks! 😉
If you want to avoid Adobe monopoly I have a list with great alternatives here : https://alternativeto.net/lists/25812/softwares-for-content-creators-that-don-t-want-to-supports-adobe-monopole-/
Awesome list!
Thanks, I should take the time to test new alternatives but it's pretty complete for my ex-usage of Adobe Creative Suite.
Jokes on them, I only use older firewalled copies that are easy to find that do everything you need except for AI implementations.
Mega yikes. I don't really do any photo editing, but it is shocking to see more big companies make more shocking decisions like this.
So all the people with data in Photoshop, and whose business model relied on Photoshop, are suddenly forced to agree to them accessing and using your content?
And btw, Photoshop reportedly has a tendency to move your content into the Cloud and delete offline copies, as per HackerNews users.
Does this mean it's now actually ethical to pirate Adobe products?
At this point, pirating an older non cloud connected version should be the only option people even consider if they insist on running this proprietary garbage that's owned by these evil, greedy companies. Or better yet, switch to open source alternatives.