Hugo is described as 'general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages. Hugo flexibly works with many formats and is ideal for blogs, docs, portfolios and much more' and is a popular Static Site Generator in the Development category. There are more than 50 alternatives to Hugo for a variety of platforms, including Self-Hosted solutions, Linux, Mac, Windows and Online / Web-based. Most alternatives are Static Site Generators, Website Builders and Blog Publishing Tools. The best alternative is WordPress, which is both free and Open Source. Other great apps like Hugo are Ghost (Free Personal, Open Source), Jekyll (Free, Open Source), Grav (Free, Open Source) and Gatsby (Freemium, Open Source).
WordPress is software designed for everyone, emphasizing accessibility, performance, security, and ease of use. We believe great software should work with minimum set up, so you can focus on sharing your story, product, or services freely.
Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator. It takes a template directory (representing the raw form of a website), runs it through and Liquid converters, and spits out a complete, static website suitable for serving with Apache or your favorite web server.
Jekyll vs Hugo opinions
pros, cons and recent comments
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby (while Hugo uses Go) and I'd say it's simpler than Hugo (simpler in functionality and simpler to understand).
Grav is an easy to use, yet powerful, opensource CMS that requires no database. In a nutshell, installing Grav is a matter of unzipping the file. It is fast, has sophisticated caching, and a light footprint for optimal performance.
Next.js gives you the best developer experience with all the features you need for production: hybrid static & server rendering, TypeScript support, smart bundling, route pre-fetching, and more. No config needed.