BlueGriffon
An HTML editor based on Mozilla rendering engine. Supports some CSS3 features and since recently has a built-in SVG editor.
Recent user activities on BlueGriffon
- POX added BlueGriffon as alternative(s) to Bonsai Browser
- generickidsacct added BlueGriffon as alternative(s) to BlueGorilla
- generickidsacct added BlueGriffon as alternative(s) to Iceape-UXP
interface = bad.
performance = bad (it lags even using a intel i7)
features = most are available if you purchase the corresponding add-ons.
stability = i am trying the latest version, i added a "style" tag and it deleted it. why?, who knows.
It's a crude alternative to Dreamweaver and almost one year without updates.
• Are you a novice that wants to click together some webpages ? - This may be for you
• Are you a professional ? - Then run away now.
[Edited by meMyselfAndIYouUsWeThem, March 08]
I prefer to have split view when working with code but BlueGriffon does not seem to have this. This is deeply disappointing because I find it extremely irritating to switch between views, it disrupts workflow for me. Apparently, it used to be available as a plugin you had to buy called ActiveView but that no longer exists and it looks like all previous plugins don't work for this recent version (2.1.1) according to their site. So, I'm a bit iffy about this program especially when you also have to buy the user manual, plugins I understand, but not the very thing that helps you use it.
[Edited by viktor_is_hot, January 26]
Version 2.0 was released on June the 1st. And V 2.1 is in the works.
They is so much wrong with this software i don't know where to begin simply finding simple features is impossible.
This is the must useless comment I ever read on the Web.
How shall that help others to find their favorite App?
Reply written over 9 years ago
I have tested most of the other HTML WYSIWYG apps. I prefer BlueGriffon. It doesn't add unnecessary code to your HTML. The HTML generated can be verified by validator.w3.org. I mostly write HTML with a text editor, but when I want WYSIWYG this is the one I use.
Reply written almost 9 years ago