WordPress Alternatives for Self Publishers

Before WordPress I was a dedicated Movable Type publisher. Then Movable Type changed, they dropped the free. At some point Melody, an open source Movable Type, tried to get a foothold. But, for whatever reason, it did not get far. You can still find it, abandoned. These days there are stirrings about a free or open source Movable Type. But, they never turn up to be anything but old software, inactive and fairly useless. If you want to run Movable Type these days, it starts at about $1000, depending on your currency.

I tried to find the mythical open source Movable Type, but, it proved to be just a myth in reality.

I liked Textpattern until I actually started using it. There were small things which just became annoying. Plus, it did not seem active as software. Writing this today however, I see the site has just had an overhaul (in August). Could there be hope the software has been given some TLC too? I reserve full judgment until I take another look at the Textpattern CMS, partly because I like the look of the site even more than I did before.

I really wanted to become part of the TYPO3 community and one of the devoted users of this CMS. But, it was just a little too complicated to get started with. Tutorials did not help but I searched Amazon and eBay until I found a book about using TYPO3, in English. Even though the book was seriously outdated I was hopeful and installed TYOP3 a third time, determined to get the hang of it. I did not get far and the book was almost no help, of course.

I'm not sure I would try TYPO3 again, even if it did have a recently updated book, in English. I think part of the problem was my own impatience to get started with this CMS. It seemed to have everything I wanted and an interesting community behind it. In the end, I couldn't figure it out and I couldn't find enough help to get past the hurdles.

I tried concrete5 at least twice over this year. I did not get far with it. Installing was difficult. Then trying to deal with it, find my way around... I wanted to like it but it was just not user friendly enough for me. There are enough other CMS options that I am not likely to try concrete5 again.

So young, so hip and so trendy when you first take a look. But, MODx would not install. Even their own tech support could not figure it out, though they did try. I gave up on something I could not install after a third try. Your experience may differ.

Tricky and confusing, is it free, or not. My conclusion was that it was not free. This eliminated it for me because I just don't have that kind of budget. I have bought software and donated to software but I prefer open source or free software because it leaves me with less hard feelings when the software suddenly stops being supported or does not do what I expected it would. (I tend to be stoically, politely Canadian and not ask for returns, refunds or exchanges).

Known seemed to be wonderfully simple, especially for content curation and making quick note sort of posts. But, I did not feel good about the free/ not free aspect of the software. It's not easy to trust software when I pay for it and less so when it starts out as free, but actually isn't.

Jekyll is not user friendly. I could not install it, though I really did want to see more than tutorials and reviews, I did not.

Ghost and Jekyll were both headaches. In addition, Ghost is not free to use. So, I just didn't try very hard when it came to understanding how to install it or go beyond that. As with Jekyll, it looks like something intended for developers, not publishers or writers.

Publii is different. You can run Publii without a database, no SQL required. Sometimes called a flat file or a static website, this means you can run Publii from your desktop. You need a web host for the domain but all the files can be kept offline.

I like Publii but, at the time I was working with it, I could not migrate my sites from WordPress. Since then they have added this feature. So I am very likely to try Publii again, for smaller sites. I'm not sure a static site is the way to go for my larger, older sites with a lot of content to work with.

But, Publii is the only flat file CMS on this list because I had zero problems with the software. It is actively developed and a better alternative to Word|Press for self publishers. You really do have full control of your site and your content when it is right there on your desktop (laptop, etc.).

If you really want a change from WordPress, the atmosphere and the software, Publii is the one which really is different and reliable.

I recommend Pagekit to anyone who wants to run their own site and keep it simple. My only problem with Pagekit were my own expectations and lack of patience. Pagekit was not hard to figure out, though it was a different experience from WordPress.

First, know that Pagekit is still evolving and fairly new. Second, the editor is not what you will be used to with WordPress, Blogger, etc. A silly thing, but it would annoy me that I could not cut and paste things into a post. Also, I did not work with Pagekit steadily so I kept having to remember what I had figured out the time before. I lost patience and that was my own problem.

Pagekit is on this list because it is a very good alternative to WordPress, but it did not suit me.

I like Blogger. I know it's not very actively updated and people (snobbishly) think it is for amateurs, etc. Wrong. Blogger is a decent CMS, still. Not a lot has changed over the years since Google took it over, but it is not dead enough to consider abandoned. Blogger works, like a little tank of a CMS.

You can run a site with Blogger, even from your own self-hosted domain if you don't want a site with blogspot.com. All the basic functions work, it is still free and you don't have to work hard to learn how to use Blogger. You can even create your own templates (themes) without being an HTML expert.

If Google stopped thinking of Blogger as a place to run more Adsense ads and nothing else, Blogger could shine as a dependable, creative and simple to use WordPress alternative. But, Google seems to forget about Blogger, except to add support for using Adsense.

I really liked Composr. I found Composr when it was evolving from ocPortal. So, Composr felt new, fresh and pretty wonderful. A great start.

However, I could not import my WordPress content (other than manually which would take a very long time for my bigger sites). Also, I had trouble with setting up links as a directory. But, Composr was one of the first I tried, early in the year. I get updates from the mailing list and I would try Composr again. So, I have hope Composr will grow and be a strong alternative to WordPress.

A huge list of features. I have tried Tiki Wiki more than once over the years, not just this past year. I found it required time to figure out the software and then it was hard to understand what should go where. On the plus side, it is very adaptable because you can make a lot of your own decisions with the software.

But, when I really decided to use Tiki Wiki I discovered how outdated it is. Reading tutorials was not a lot of help because the software had changed from the time the tutorials were written. Yet, the software was not as actively updated as I expected, or hoped. So, I left Tiki Wiki behind.

I invested a lot of time in learning how to use Joomla (afterward I tried Drupal and due to my experience with Joomla I did not put in as much time). I bought 2 books to help me figure out Joomla. It is quite different from working with WordPress, even though I have worked with other CMS software and thought I knew how a CMS works. Joomla (and Drupal) are not simple if you have a background in WordPress, Blogger and most other software I have used to publish my sites online. I don't think of that as a negative point, just a fact to be aware of. If you want to try either of these, know you won't be set up and running your site without taking time to learn the software.

Once I felt I had an understanding of the software I began trying to get my old WordPress site up. This required buying more software, through Joomla. Just as WordPress has plugins listed on their site, Joomla does the same. Most of the software was outdated and did not work or required a credit card. Some software were both not free and not functional.

Overall, I did not find any good reason to stick with Joomla, or Drupal.

Drupal and Joomla were very alike I found. I ended up buying a book to learn each of them. I found them both just as commercially focused as WordPress.

A few months after trying Drupal I can't remember anything important enough to add to a review. I was disappointed but, at least this time I did not spend money on extras to set up my sites.

I found b2 the best alternative to WordPress. It is free to use, open source and has not become commercial (targeted to web developers and marketers, not writers and publishers). b2 is user friendly and has a lot of function and features for publishers. A plus for me is the history behind b2, it is not a new start up. b2evolution was here when WordPress was starting.

My only problem is how images are loaded. When you write a post and want to include an image you have to open a new screen and upload your image to your site. Then, go back to the screen you are writing your post in and add the image there. It is an extra step. I do understand that using images this way means I can upload them exactly where I want each image in my site files. But, when I'm writing a post, opening another screen interrupts the flow of my writing. Really, I just need to adapt and add images after the post is written.

WordPress is not a lot better at this, still no way to really deal with images when you have a lot of them (unless you try more plugins to organize and edit them). At least with b2 you don't need to add plugins.

However, b2 is actively evolving and developing. Support for anything I asked about was quick and very good at fixing problems. Also, b2 is one of the few CMS alternatives which does work to import your WordPress site. I tested it on 3 different sites of my own. The only problem I had was one site which failed due to some added code/ glitch in the WordPress imported files (possibly generated by a plugin at some point though I tried with all plugins deleted or disabled).

Unfortunately, b2 does not have what I wanted for keeping links as a resource directory. WordPress doesn't either, unless you use a plugin to bring the link manager back.

b2 does have the bookmarklet for adding posts from your web browser. This is another feature WordPress decided to remove. I use the bookmarklet often! I can write a post while I am still at the source of my inspiration and link to the source site. Content curation and writing a short post when and where you find your inspiration makes publishing so much easier than returning to your site every time you want to post anything.

For a lot of reasons, b2 is my favourite WordPress alternative. It is user friendly, not drastically unlike WordPress in how it works, not commercial or abandoned software. Help is great and the tutorials on the site are kept fairly up to date with the software.

Plus, it is easy to have multi sites and users on your domain, if you wanted to get help running all your sites. I consider help, but no one does everything just the way I do everything and I really like doing everything my way.