Wikipedia Alternatives

Wikipedia is described as 'Free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system' and is a leading Encyclopedia in the education & reference category. There are more than 50 alternatives to Wikipedia for a variety of platforms, including Online / Web-based, Windows, Linux, Mac and Android. The best alternative is Encyclopædia Britannica, which is free. Other great apps like Wikipedia are Kiwix, Scholarpedia, WikiSpooks.com and Metacademy.

Wikipedia alternatives are mainly Encyclopedias but may also be Online Education Services. Filter by these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of Wikipedia.

This page was last updated

Wikipedia

1526

Free • Open Source
Encyclopedia

Online
Android
iPhone
Android Tablet
iPad
Kindle Fire
MediaWiki

Free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open...

Learn more about Wikipedia

Encyclopædia Britannica
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Freemium • Proprietary
Encyclopedia
Mac
Windows
Online
36 alternatives to Encyclopædia Britannica
The Encyclopædia Britannica is a general English-language encyclopaedia published by Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., a privately-held company. The articles in the Britannica are aimed at educated adult readers, and written by a staff of about 100 full-time editors and...
Suggest and vote on features
Encyclopædia Britannica Features
Article search
Trust Level system
Knowledge base
Encyclopædia Britannica vs Wikipedia
Most users think Encyclopædia Britannica is a great alternative to Wikipedia.
ab1
Reliable source but not complete.
Positive comment• ago

1

PERCE_NEIGE
It's not about crowd-sourced content, but it's a reliable source of info, with checked content. For this, it should be considered as a Wikipedia alternative, to get the info (of course not for the crowd-source part, but most ot the Wikipedia users use the encyclopædia as an info source, not for editing.
Positive comment• ago

4

PERCE_NEIGE
That's better than Wikipedia, as info are checked, and edited by specialists. Wikipedia is fun, but it gives sometimes wrong info, and is a place where there are power and lobbies fights. I've found some weird propaganda pages, and I've been the first one to ask for deletion in years, and many other weird info found on this site. Wikipedia is useful to share knowledge, but it's really idealized, and a dangerous tool if it's the only encyclopædia that you use.
Positive comment• ago

2

Guest
Wikipedia is free and edited by community. EB is commercial and without the community driven fresh information.
Negative comment• ago

0
Kiwix
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Mac
Windows
Linux
Android
iPhone
Android Tablet
iPad
Wine
24 alternatives to Kiwix
Kiwix enables you to have the whole Wikipedia at hand wherever you go! You don't need Internet, everything is stored on your computer, USB flash drive or DVD!.
Suggest and vote on features
Kiwix Features
1. PortableKiwix can be used from a USB stick or similar with no prior installation.
2. Works OfflineKiwix can be used without the need to connect to the internet.
Save web page for offline use
Data portability
Offline Reading
Wiki
Reading
Offline
Kiwix vs Wikipedia
pros, cons and recent comments
PERCE_NEIGE
It's a good alternative (but it's an app, not a site), as it's offline Wikipedia. But they made weird choices because they chose the .zim extension for their archive. That's weird and everything but handy. And they should add a way to download only some articles, and turning them into .pdf or .epub, it would make the application really modern and handy!
Positive comment• ago

4
Scholarpedia
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Proprietary
Encyclopedia
Online
24 alternatives to Scholarpedia
Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia written and maintained by scholarly experts from around the world. Scholarpedia is inspired by Wikipedia and aims to complement it by providing in-depth scholarly treatments of academic topics.
Suggest and vote on features
Scholarpedia Features
1. Ad-freeScholarpedia doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
Wiki
Knowledge base
Add a screenshot
WikiSpooks.com
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Encyclopedia
Online
79 alternatives to WikiSpooks.com
WikiSpooks is a global alternative encyclopedia on politics, spy craft, deep state intelligence, and conspiracies, free of corporate influence, partisan politics, or government propaganda for historians and truth-seekers to read, edit, and share.
Suggest and vote on features
WikiSpooks.com Features
Anticensorship
Free Speech
Add a screenshot
Metacademy
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Online
14 alternatives to Metacademy
Metacademy - a free open source platform for efficient, personalized learning.
Suggest and vote on features
Metacademy Features
Knowledge base
Community-based
Metacademy vs Wikipedia
Almost everyone thinks Metacademy is a great alternative to Wikipedia.
Metapedia
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Proprietary
Encyclopedia
Online
12 alternatives to Metapedia
Metapedia is an electronic encyclopedia which focuses on culture, art, science, philosophy and politics.
Suggest and vote on features
Metapedia Features
Wiki
Warning
According to WikiPedia and various user reports: “Metapedia is an online wiki-based encyclopedia, which contains fascist, far-right, white nationalist, white supremacist, anti-feminist, homophobic, Islamophobic, antisemitic, Holocaust-denying, and neo-Nazi points of view.”

Metapedia vs Wikipedia
pros, cons and recent comments
Arius
It is more concerned with facts and truth than with pushing an agenda. If it's been flagged by know-it-all busy-bodies as "extremist", you know it's probably honest.
Positive comment• ago

0

Guest
Metapedia similiar to Wikipedia, but without NPOV and PC.
Positive comment• ago

-1

dayixe
Metapedia unashamedly gives the pro-European perspective on political topics, while Wikipedia censors such opinions while considering itself neutral.
Positive comment• ago

0
Oppia
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Online Education Service
Mac
Windows
Linux
Online
Self-Hosted
78 alternatives to Oppia
Oppia is a free, open-source learning platform. Full of interactive activities called 'explorations', Oppia helps curious minds learn and teach.
Suggest and vote on features
Oppia Features
Visual Editing
World History Encyclopedia
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Proprietary
Encyclopedia
Online Education Service
Online
14 alternatives to World History Encyclopedia
The web's source of information for Ancient History: definitions, articles, timelines, maps, books, and illustrations. We're a small non-profit organisation dedicated to giving highest-quality history content to the world’s history enthusiasts, teachers, and students for...
Suggest and vote on features
World History Encyclopedia Features
Knowledge base
Infogalactic
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Online
8 alternatives to Infogalactic
Infogalactic is an Internet-based, free-content encyclopedia project that is a dynamic fork of Wikipedia and improves upon the online encyclopedia's model of openly editable content. Infogalactic's pages are interlinked in order to connect the user to related pages with...
Suggest and vote on features
Infogalactic Features
Knowledge base
Wiki
Warning
The articles are not accurate, out of date and politically spun.
Citizendium
Is this a good alternative?
Yes
No
Free • Open Source
Encyclopedia
Online
32 alternatives to Citizendium
Citizendium, powered by MediaWiki, is "an open wiki project dedicated to creating a free, comprehensive, and reliable repository of structured knowledge". Unlike with Wikipedia, a contributor must register using their real name and verify their identity.
Suggest and vote on features
Citizendium Features
1. Ad-freeCitizendium doesn't contain any form of external advertising.
Wiki-like interface
Wiki
Knowledge base
Add a screenshot

Citizendium vs Wikipedia
pros, cons and recent comments
the_real_dvs1
By requiring users to register with their real names and verify their identity, Citizendium avoids sockpuppetry and holds people accountable for their writing.
Positive comment• ago

2

DLwebmaster
There is a level of accountability that is not provided by free sites - you have to register properly otherwise you cannot contribute.
Positive comment• ago

0