Netflix to acquire Warner Bros and its streaming platform HBO Max for 82.7 billion dollars

Netflix to acquire Warner Bros and its streaming platform HBO Max for 82.7 billion dollars

Netflix has recently announced a plan to acquire Warner Bros. for approximately 82.7 billion dollars, with the agreement contingent on regulatory and shareholder approval. The acquisition will only proceed after Warner Bros. concludes a previously declared de-merger that separates its cable and Discovery businesses, which is expected to finish in the third quarter of 2026.

The deal would include not only Warner Bros.’ owned IPs like Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings, but also its entire video game division and HBO Max, its streaming platform. Regulatory scrutiny may become a major obstacle, as authorities in several countries may challenge the acquisition over concerns that Netflix would gain excessive market power, given its position as the leading global streaming platform and HBO Max as a close competitor. If a single key regulator blocks the deal, it cannot proceed. Meanwhile, Paramount and Skydance contest Netflix’s offer, saying their own bid was higher and covered the entire company. Paramount argues its proposal would face fewer regulatory issues and is considering appealing directly to Warner Bros. shareholders in a potential hostile takeover, adding further uncertainty to the process.

Netflix has stated it intends to maintain Warner Bros.’ theatrical releases and day to day operations without immediate changes. The long term future of HBO Max as a standalone service remains uncertain, since Netflix is expected to fold much of Warner Bros.’ catalog, including HBO and DC Studios, into its own library. For now, users are told that nothing will change and that HBO Max will stay online until all approvals are completed. Personally, I wouldn’t hold my breath that things will remain the same after that, especially given the steady price hikes and general shitification Netflix has gone through in recent years.

by Mauricio B. Holguin

Maoholguin
cz
Em
Jqri
Maoholguin found this interesting

Comments

PearOfJudes
4

$83 billion making a handful of already wealthy people richer, and only increases the monopolisation and corporisation of art.

1 reply
BorisF

I do not know if this deal will make anybody richer other than current head of WB. Netflix will go into deep debt. They have already proven that they can take somebody's great properties (Avatar: Last Air bender, Witcher) are screw them up. Subscribers will have to pay more for the bundle. As I said, this deal will benefit only one man.

UserPower
-4

Yes, POTUS' best buddy Larry Ellison, owner of CBS/Paramount/Skydance, Oracle and co-owner to be of TikTok US (if it doesn't extinct soon), is less than happy to see Netflix bidding more than him to get WDB.

So slim chances that Netflix get much of it, especially since Netflix has produced "Boots", the military drama about a gay teen recruit.

Even if Netflix has announced wanting to maintain current WBD operations (instead of firing pretty much everybody), and that the deal didn't included CNN or Discovery+, which won't be a great loss.

nns
0

More consolidation means more enshittification aiming to curb competition and innovation. Writers Guild of America is against it in full (1, 2, 3,) something that the Antitrust laws should have forbidden in the first place given the scope above. WGA argues this merger means layoffs, dewages, worse entertainment worker conditions, nickel-and-diming of consumers, and "content" (sic) sterilization. There is already too much control on what consumers should watch, be it television, streaming, and theaters.

In addition to monopolizing entertainment, it pushes the Digital Restrictions Malware with copyright extremism up to (or even beyond) you-own-nothing-and-be-happy level. DRM malware is against free web. However, there is no reason to outsource your entertainment to a proprietary cabal - self-hosting by using the likes of MediaGoblin icon MediaGoblin and PeerTube icon PeerTube will become the only option as soon as the "content" (sic) you're looking for gets erased for whatever reason (e.g. censorship, DEI/politics).

1 reply
PearOfJudes

You lost me at DEI/politics, I think the last thing Netflix cares about in this circumstance is reducing inequality for women and minorities. Other than that I fully agree with you, and this website shows the software which can be used to replace Netflix once they inevitably increase prices again. stremio + Torrentio + real-debrid

Gu