
Streamable
Streamable is the world's easiest way to create and share video. It's simple, fast, and it's free.
What is Streamable?
Streamable is the world's easiest way to create and share video. It's simple, fast, and it's free.
Streamable Screenshots
Streamable Features
Comments and Reviews
Tags
- Video Editor
- Video Streaming
Category
Video & MoviesRecent user activities on Streamable
luislobo9b added Streamable as alternative(s) to COS.TV
RemovedUser thinks PeerTube is an alternative to Streamable
RemovedUser added Streamable as alternative(s) to PeerTube
Works well with imgur gifs to convert them to mp4, I needed video controls on some of my longer gifs
I've.. tried to use Streamable for years. It has some odd bandwidth issues, where you'll apparently be being blocked or throttled whenever trying to view clips on the website, even when they're your own.
It's a shame because it's a beautiful site, really. You simply upload a clip, it gets processed, you get a link, no questions asked. There's no sign of all the extraneous information you can add when submitting a video to YouTube. Streamable's minimalism is its strongest point.
But when the video viewing experience itself is so poor (and judging by reddit I'm certainly not the only one), I'm constantly on the lookout for a solid alternatives. To give you a sense of how much I want to be able to use Streamable properly, I've used subdomain scanners to get the hostnames and IPs of alternative CDNs and used NextDNS' URL rewrites and hosts file entries to force Streamable to let me use a different CDN. It worked for a few months..
Streamable's bread and butter is minimalism, and it does well. But the meat and potatoes of the site is still video viewing, and that, it does a particularly poor job.
[Edited by redbeardt, June 21]
It ceased to provide a possibility to upload and share files without signing up, so it suddenly lost its entire value to me.
Unfortunately the free account service is now limited to 720@60fps (was 1080p@60). Bad choice. They should have reduced stream size/video length instead for free accounts IMHO.
No they should just cap quality imo
Reply written ago
As posts indicates
There's a lot more users using streamable to host their short video clips here, since its not tied to any of their youtube accounts, etc