iWeb Alternatives for Mac
There are many alternatives to iWeb for Mac and since it's discontinued a lot of people are looking for a replacement. The best Mac alternative is WordPress, which is both free and Open Source. If that doesn't suit you, our users have ranked more than 50 alternatives to iWeb and many of them are available for Mac so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement. Other interesting Mac alternatives to iWeb are photos2webgallery, Jekyll, Hugo and Sparkle.
iWeb alternatives are mainly Website Builders but may also be CMS Tools or Static Site Generators. Filter by these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of iWeb.- Freemium • Open Source
- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Online
- Android
- iPhone
- Android Tablet
- iPad
- Self-Hosted
- PHP
- Cloudron
WordPress is software designed for everyone, emphasizing accessibility, performance, security, and ease of use. We believe great software should work with minimum set up, so you can focus on sharing your story, product, or services freely.
WordPress vs iWeb opinions
wordpress is a web based cms. iweb is and offline desktop static site builder.
Wordpress compares to iWeb like your car compares to a ocean cargo ship. Suddenly you need to use a browser to edit your site, buy addons, pay for someone to manage security issues. Not worth it.
Create lovely photo web galleries directly from your Photos library on Mac. Share the generated HTML output folder with your family and friends in any possible way – e.g., via your personal website or external storage.
photos2webgallery vs iWeb opinions
smartest iWeb replacement in terms of photo galleries
smart way to replace the photo webgallery feature of iWeb
- Free • Open Source
- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Self-Hosted
Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator. It takes a template directory (representing the raw form of a website), runs it through and Liquid converters, and spits out a complete, static website suitable for serving with Apache or your favorite web server.
- Free • Open Source
- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Self-Hosted
Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages. Hugo flexibly works with many formats and is ideal for blogs, docs, portfolios and much more.
Hugo vs iWeb opinions
Hugo is a command line based environment for generating static sites. Can't think of anything further from iWeb
Dreaming a modern website? Dreading the HTML and CSS? Sparkle is what you're looking for!
Sparkle vs iWeb opinions
Similar simple concept of drag and drop. Be aware you need to pay 160$+ if you want to handle more than one domain. Other than that its simple, just do it and publish.
Absolutely no programming required, no weird "plugins" sold separately, real drag and drop of content and placing of items on the website and layout.
It works kind of like Keynote or Pages, so just like iWeb did, no templates that are hardcoded, no funky web app that restarts halfway through editing a page. Sparkle shines!
In a nutshell, Bridgetown is a static site generator. You give it text written in an author-friendly markup language like Markdown, and it uses layouts and templates to build a website and save the compiled HTML, CSS, and Javascript to an output folder.
No screenshots yetWith EverWeb, anyone can create a professional website just by dragging and dropping. Use one of the built in templates, or start completely from scratch and design the perfect website for your business or personal hobby.
Minerva is a static site generators. Minerva makes building websites fun again.
No screenshots yet- Free • Open Source
- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Online
- Self-Hosted
- Software as a Service (SaaS)
Mixcore CMS is an open-source modular, multi-tenant application framework built on top of ASP.NET Core (Dotnet Core). It is a completed open source ASP.NET Core (Dotnet Core) CMS solution. https://mixcore.org.
A WYSIWYG web editor for mac. Intuitive program allows for the creation of complex websites in a short time with little to no coding experience required. Rapidweaver integrates with several web 2.
Rapidweaver vs iWeb opinions
Does not have the same ease of use understandability
Too complicated to actually get something done, often requires purchase of third-party plugins to get to the level of usability you may expect from full-priced software.