Claude
272 likes
AI assistant offering secure chat and API access, specializing in summarization, search, writing, Q&A, and coding, with large token windows, customizable behavior, top data retention policies, and advanced safeguards for secure and reliable enterprise or individual use.
Cost / License
- Freemium (Subscription)
- Proprietary
Application typeApplication types
Platforms
- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Online
- Android
- iPhone
- iPad
- Software as a Service (SaaS)
- Google Sheets
- Google Docs
- Google Slides
- Google Workspace
- Android Tablet
Features
Highlights All activities
Claude News & Activities
Recent News
- Paul published news article about Claude
- Paul published news article about Claude
- Mauricio B. Holguin published news article about Claude
Recent activities
- Ciro Cesar Maciel liked Claude
- SKA liked Claude
Scott-Bogdan added Claude as alternative to Clone StudioI vibe-code Windows apps with Claude. The ideas and decisions are mine, and Claude writes the code. It handles big changes across many files without losing track.
- Marko Veselinović liked Claude
- Able Styles liked Claude
- crysal liked Claude
Autonomous Agents
Agents that can do anything for you - provided you pay. ANYTHING.
Web Search & AI Tools
Searching the internet and using tools such as AI to help. Web Browsers that provide a platform for searching the web.
Best AI Coding Assistants for Professional Developers (2026)
A curated list of AI coding assistants that improve software development, debugging, refactoring, and productivity. These are the tools I consider the most useful for professional development.


















Comments and Reviews
Not too bad at all. The free plan is pretty much limited in the number of queries and the complexity of the result, so don't get too comfy. Plus, just as with the competitors, data may not be up-to-date, so effective usage is to do some of your own research and feed that back. The feedback mechanism can take in a lot of text and is good.
The guardrails make it almost unusable except for base things like summarizing and coming up with ideas that are not novel.
I vibe-code Windows apps with Claude. The ideas and decisions are mine, and Claude writes the code. It handles big changes across many files without losing track.
Great tool for getting better texts and for structuring work. Keep in mind to add data on your own and to check before publishing ... any AI can lie without giving a sign.
Claude uses geolocation blocking
Been using Claude for the better part of a year now, mostly for work stuff. A lot of it is greenfield design discussion or picking apart legacy Java services I inherited, plus the occasional postmortem rewrite I'd rather not do from scratch.
Two things genuinely won me over. The long-context behavior actually holds up when you paste in a 4k-line file and ask focused questions about it, where other models I've tried start hallucinating method signatures around the 2k-token mark. And the writing voice is calmer than the alternatives. When I ask for a code review or a doc rewrite I don't get that breathless marketing tone. It just answers the question.
The friction point I keep hitting: rate limits on the Pro plan are tighter than I'd like if I'm in a heads-down session. Twice this month I got cut off mid-debug and had to wait it out or jump over to the API, which sort of defeats the point of paying for the chat product. Anthropic clearly knows about it, but it's the one caveat I bring up when colleagues ask me whether to switch.
Compared to ChatGPT it's a real tradeoff. Claude is better at thinking through a problem, ChatGPT has more tooling. I keep both open.