ChemDraw
Utility for processing, structuring, and drawing chemical data.
- Paid • Proprietary
- Mac
- Windows
...
Communicate with the natural language of chemical structures, biological pathways, and models
Show full description
Features Vote on or suggest new features
This app doesn't have any features at the moment.Comments and Reviews Post a comment / reviewSort: relevance • date
Category
Education & ReferenceTags
- chemistry
- chemical
- chemical-structures
- biodraw
- chemoffice
- molecule
- structure-drawing
- reaction
No screenshots yet
ChemDraw
Summary and Relevance
Our users have written 2 comments and reviews about ChemDraw, and it has gotten 5 likes
- Developed by CambridgeSoft Corporation
- Proprietary and Commercial product.
- One time purchase (perpetual license)
- Average rating of 1.5
- 12 alternatives listed
Popular alternatives
View allChemDraw was added to AlternativeTo by on Oct 15, 2009 and this page was last updated Feb 13, 2020.
The Short Version
ChemDraw is a disgrace. No Linux version (in this day and age for the academic community!). Both Windows and Mac versions are riddled with the most ridiculous bugs. Every new release contains more junk (e.g. little cartoons of animals), whilst the basics suffer from evermore fundamental problems with everything from copy/paste, to Retina display support, to opening blank pages, to simply moving structures, to randomly closing the program ("ChemDraw has stopped working and needs to close..."). When it does run, it's heavy on system resources.
The support forums are often full of issues that go unanswered and unresolved for weeks. They are particularly fond of blaming Microsoft Windows/Office for various problems. And, on top of all this, ChemDraw is ridiculously expensive. They are plain, out-and-out raping public education institutions. They are able to do this because they have a virtual monopoly in this space. Their closest competitor is ChemDoodle, which seems like a one man operation (and he's done amazingly well, to be honest and has a Linux version).
ChemDraw software isn't smart enough to understand when it is activated by a site licence. So every year it bothers literally hundreds of people - who can do nothing about it - that it's time to get a new code.
Sadly, because ChemDraw have cornered the market early on, they have become the default. This means that if you want to stay compatible with the majority of other chemistry researchers, you're likely to need it. Otherwise, stay away and consider ChemDoodle. It's a little unintuitive and slightly less functional, but it's usable, much cheaper and offers a consistent cross-platform experience.
Update: This month, academic licences for ChemDraw 15 came to an end, and those 'privileged' enough to be at institutions with a site licence are able to download ChemDraw 16. A whole new release? No. Absolutely no tangible difference in performance or bug fixes. The tool menus still flicker randomly when dragged around, and menus won't stay open when clicked - that's new. On the plus side, there's a whole new "bug" menu, where you can select varieties of butterflies to paste into your work. Very useful for chemists interested in chemical structures. I wrote above that "ChemDraw is a criminally expensive, buggy, poorly supported, Linux-hostile mess." Version 16 stays faithful to all those traditional ChemDraw 'ideals'.
Reply written more than a year ago
When John says ChemDraw is "criminally expensive," he's not kidding. The version with minimal features and lowest-tier support (Prime and Bronze) for a single, named user is $525 for a year's subscription at the time of this comment. For comparison a year's subscription to "all 20+ creative desktop and mobile apps" in Adobe's product line is $599 for a single user and comes with perks like 100GB of cloud storage and hosting for a web site.
Adobe has long been regarded as hideously expensive for a single user (and it is, but if their business model is "individuals pirate our software or use GIMP, enterprise buys it," who am I to judge?), but even if ChemDraw was flawless and an angelic choir sang in the background while you use it it wouldn't be 87% as valuable as Photoshop, Illustrator, Acrobat Pro, and Flash Pro (which are not all you get in Adobe's package).
Also, the competitor John mentions offers individuals a full software package that costs around half as much at $254 (as of this comment), and that isn't a subscription (support expires, software does not).
Reply written more than a year ago