Google’s new fingerprinting policy sparks privacy concerns as it tracks all your devices

Google’s new fingerprinting policy sparks privacy concerns as it tracks all your devices

Google has implemented new tracking policies that affect various connected devices, including smartphones, consoles, and smart TVs. The updated tracking method, known as fingerprinting, collects detailed information about a device's hardware and software to uniquely identify users. Unlike cookies, which users can delete, fingerprinting is nearly impossible to block, even with VPNs or private browsers.

This marks a shift from Google's 2019 stance, when it condemned fingerprint tracking as "wrong." The policy, which took effect on February 16, 2024, does not allow users to opt-out, and critics argue that the policy primarily benefits Google and the advertising industry by enabling tracking that users cannot block, including UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), Stephen Almond.

Google defends the policy by citing the widespread use of similar tracking methods by other companies and the ineffectiveness of traditional data collection methods on devices like smart TVs and gaming consoles. Privacy-focused users may find it challenging to prevent fingerprinting, as traditional methods like clearing cookies or using incognito mode are ineffective. In the meantime, browsers like Mozilla Firefox and Brave offer some fingerprinting protection, and Chrome extensions like CanvasBlocker can help obscure tracking signals.

by Mauricio B. Holguin

ewanneiljustarandom
ma
du
ewanneil found this interesting
  • ...

Google Chrome is a web browser that supports multiple accounts and syncs seamlessly across devices. It features an integrated password manager, dark mode, and real-time website translation. Rated 3.3, Chrome is extensible by plugins/extensions and offers cloud and Android sync capabilities. Top alternatives include Mozilla Firefox, Brave, and Vivaldi.

Comments

uw4gssexn
0

https://searx.space/ They're all a little different in their settings, and sometimes they get banned by different engines, but there's almost always a few that can get you what you are looking for.

Review by a new / low-activity user.
Mr. Anon
4

Techie Translation:

  1. Similar tracking methods by other companies: "That guy over there is stealing, so I can steal too."
  2. Ineffectiveness of traditional data collection methods: "We want more data. Yes, we already have a lot, but we want more."
SuperCoolDude
3

I find it funny that the minute that Google starts losing market share, they say "f- it, mask off"

Asumeh
10

Now, just what changed Google's mind about fingerprint tracking in the first place?

The fact that using privacy-oriented browsers and extensions isn't enough to stop all of it is sickening. At this point, you're better off entirely ditching Google services and hardware altogether, which is a monster of a task unless you're committed to full privacy from Google.

1 reply
UserPower

Data analytics global market was about $70B last year, and is projected to grow up to $100B in 2030. Privacy software market was less than $4B last year, and is projected to grow to about $35B in 2030. This doesn't give a second thought. And since Google activity has already been advertising, when they'll lose Chrome, tracking users will be much more difficult.

Gu