Video Editing

• Lot of features such as customization, tons of text, transition, filters, overlays, elements, etc,
• User Friendly,
• Portable version available,
• File size export instant estimation, and many more
• transition not customizable, it has its standards,
• create watermark for free version,
• preview freeze on splitting clip,
• high resource usage,
• doesnt load resource when project loaded, high chance to mistake video or project file,
• doesnt support selected media length

User Friendly and used to be most popular video editor but Windows Movie Maker is no longer updated and supported by Microsoft.

Review from alternativeto.net

• 13mb installed (yes, 13mb)
• open fast, no lags, good for old and bad computers without resources
• have basic features for a good edit
• support keyframes (but limited worflow)
• the video and effects needs cache into the software to execute completly
• some simple tasks can be painful (move objects, add effects…), needs to improve some mechanics to be most effective
• offer other products to make other tasks (i don’t like it)

• Portable version available on website but
• Lack of Features : Unable to add components such as text, content, etc

• 64-bit only available,
• Frequent Crash,
• High Resource Usage,
• Text file need to save as individual file,
• Video Preview are not working,
• Buggy Tutorial Mode

It is Commercial tool

• need user account to use it,
• No user friendly,
• Cumbersome UI.,
• Imports only some clips since does not manage different frame rates in one project,
• Frequent locks,
• Difficult zooming and syncro video/audio,
• Playback not working with xvid coded clips (XVID!)

• 64-bit only available,
• Require FFMPEG to use,
• More Coming Soon~

• Portableapps Support,
• but Not user friendly

• It is Commercial tool that meets Industry Standard Video Editor with CUDA Fast Rendering
• but Not User Friendly,
• High Resource Usage,
• MKV,FLV are not supported,
• Sequence setting need to be reconfigured or video display will be cropped