

Media Bias Fact Check
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News) is an independent online media outlet. MBFC is dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices. The extension will display a color-coded icon denoting the bias of the current page.
Cost / License
- Free
- Proprietary
Platforms
- Online
- Vivaldi Browser
- Google Chrome
- Firefox
Features
- Web-Based
- Fact Checking
- Browser extension
Media Bias Fact Check News & Activities
Recent activities
- double2 replied to a comment / review on Media Bias Fact Check
- double2 liked Media Bias Fact Check
- yeyer11817 rated Media Bias Fact Check
- yeyer11817 liked Media Bias Fact Check
Danilo_Venom added Media Bias Fact Check as alternative to Cognitive Bias Labs
yeyer11817 added Media Bias Fact Check as alternative to Biasly
JoelFromCheckTextBias added Media Bias Fact Check as alternative to Check Text Bias
ali-hassan added Media Bias Fact Check as alternative to Navigate Compass
Media Bias Fact Check information
Featured in Lists
The open source apps I use
The products listed below provide ratings of the reliability of various sources of infomations . sources include news …
What is Media Bias Fact Check?
This extension shows an icon denoting the political bias for the current page. This extension will display a color-coded icon denoting the bias of the page you are currently viewing, according to Media Bias/Fact Check. You can click the icon to read more notes about the site, or visit MBFC for more details.
An official extension for MBFC News, which you can visit here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/





Comments and Reviews
Apart from being very biased and placing leaning right or simply wing news outlets as extreme right. They also repeatedly quote form RationalWiki, a radical and extremist left wiki site, to back up their stances and ideas of any certain website. Therefore, this website show itself to not be centrist at all even if it purports to be.
Interesting point. I think the challenge for any platform like Media Bias Fact Check is that 'objectivity' itself is often viewed through the observer's own lens. Using RationalWiki might be controversial for some, but the key is whether their underlying data methodology (like looking at ownership, sourcing, and correction frequency) holds up.
For me, as someone who builds data-driven utilities, I always tell users to cross-reference multiple fact-checking sources rather than relying on one single authority. It's about building a 'triangulation' of truth. Do you find other alternatives that use a more transparent scoring system?