wallabag has many of the features that Pocket has and is a great and totally free alternative. The reading experience is clean and free from distractions. What makes it even more attractive is the fact that it’s open source and can be self-hosted, which makes it a good solution if you value privacy. If you need hosting, wallabag offers a competitive price for only €9 per year. With migration tools for Pocket, Instapaper, and more, existing users of those services can switch quickly to wallabag. There are apps and plugins for many operating systems, RSS readers, and browsers, but their quality is not always equal. There’s an API so developers can build their own apps or get involved in the open source project.
wallabag vs Pocket opinions
Wallabag is open-source (more trustworthy).
Does everything Pocket does, and is self-hosted
Wallabag might be a nice alternative for those looking to self-host their own data, but for most this will not be a realistic option, and thus, the cloud component will not be free.
No way to use a free cloud service makes it completely useless.
No way to display the tags on the main view, Android and iOS apps lacking in functionalities
Open source, can be self hosted. Pocket sells your data to make profit.
Wallabag is more useful than pocket and open source.
Raindrop.io is a solution that is very similar to Pocket when it comes to features, ease of use, and organization. The user interface is modern, clean, and customizable with themes. Unlike Pocket, you can collaborate with your friends or coworkers to edit and read the same content saved from the web. There is a free version that has all the basic features most people need, but the Pro plan offers a lot of additional pro features like full-text search, Dropbox backup, permanent library, priority support, and a duplicate links finder tool. It has clients for most browsers, iOS, Android, Windows, Mac, and a web version. Unfortunately, like Pocket and most alternatives to it, there is no Linux version.
Raindrop.io vs Pocket opinions
This is bookmark manager. You can't read and highlight the articles inside the app.
You can edit the titles and description. This is a feature that Pocket seems reluctant/unwilling to add, and their suggested workaround is in a word, DUMB..
Saving and organicing links and articles is the same function
Instapaper has been around longer than most read-it-later services and bookmarking apps, and it is still a relevant and powerful Pocket alternative. In fact, the two apps share most features and both offer a free and premium plan. Instapaper's free plan offers saving unlimited blog posts, articles, videos, etc. and syncing them across the iOS app, Android app, and the web service. The Premium version costs $2.99 per month and lets you use full-text search, save unlimited notes, get an ad free experience, and more. If you use a Mac, then the lack of an Instapaper Mac app is a con compared to Pocket, which offers one via the Mac App Store.
Instapaper vs Pocket opinions
If privacy and open source are your priorities, then Memex is a powerful bookmarking service that could replace Pocket for you if you don’t need all its features. The free plan has powerful features that lets you save links, find them later, organize them with tags and collections and share them with the world. The paid version is €3 per month and offers syncing between mobile and desktop and backups to cloud services. Existing users of Pocket, Raindrop.io, etc. can easily import existing bookmarks and links.
Discover, save, and read what's worth your attention.
Refind vs Pocket opinions
Offers the same basic features as Pocket, plus smarter recommendation.
focused on internal articles base, cannot add own ones
TheBrain helps you organize all your Web pages, contacts, documents, emails and files in a context-driven visual map.
Send web pages and articles to your email inbox.
EmailThis removes ads & distractions from web pages and sends you a beautifully formatted email with just the text and images.
Email This vs Pocket opinions
No needless apps to install, no Big Tech surveillance concerns--simply saves pages for later viewing as emails. Simplicity at its finest.
Works on all devices. Very easy to use.
PaperSpan is an easy to use, free app to save web pages for reading later. Save pages from computer or phone's browser, and open them from either.
PaperSpan vs Pocket opinions
Highlighting, automatic categories so we can filter out by categories, reading statistics, playlist (premium).
Same Read it Later stuff and Android offline reader. And showing the page without ads.
More practical than pocket and premium $10/year compared to pocket's $40/year
Larder is for bookmarking things on the web you'll need again. It's perfect for curating lists of libraries, tools, and reference material. Trial everything for 14 days, buy a paid account if it fits your workflow. It's honestly really good.