Wikipedia Reviews

about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful 11 Helpful Report as spam

Is all fine and dandy until you try to contribute you will quickly find is not really the encyclopedia everyone can edit. There are various admins and power circles and power struggles and often good ideas get rejected and bad ideas approved simply because they "seem" okay with the admins. A lot of articles are of very poor quality and the quality is getting lower by the day it seems. I would only use to collect references. Deff never gonna donate again! Bad experience.

reply

bad admins

about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful 11 Helpful Report as spam

wikipedia admins are terrible. They don't want you to know the truth and will remove everything. I hope there will be an alternative for wikipedia.

reply

I agree. All my good contributions got reversed in a day because the got pissed at me for challenging their authority. Is more about power monopoly than truth !

Too much ads

about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful 10 Helpful Report as spam

I was happy Wikipedia user for years and now they started to spam me with "donate" ads all the time. They recently increased staff dozens of times and this is why they need so much money. They should just fire all those unnecessary staff.

reply

They need to make a living

about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful Report as spam

good and mostly reliable source of information. you shouldn't blidnly trust it, though!

reply
about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful Report as spam

Great source of information.

reply
about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful Report as spam

This has become my first source for information. Yes, you still have to check that something isn't wrong, but pure vandalism is rare these days. - Free, collaborative, open (YOU can edit it too).

reply
about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful Report as spam

Wikipedia offers information on almost any topic imaginable.

reply
about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful -1 Helpful Report as spam

Wikipedia is often used by Britons to censor the true facts of their past atrocity. A lot of English royalists, nationalists are active in this site, and they censor the information of genocide, plundering, and many other atrocities they had done in their former colonies. Their site, their admins, their people, so what makes you to think they will allow us to write their black history ? no wonder why it says history is written by victors. It's difficult to do with Indian articles because there are a lot of indians, a lot of Indians are active, but small nations like sri lanka have not much people to defend their country, and thus they often become victims. Apart from this problem, there are many other problems in Wikipedia. so I think wikipedia is a dangerous place for kids to use, as it brainwashes them with the agenda of the admins of Wikipedia. People are supposed to read different opinions from different sources, not get used to a single site. So I strongly advise parents block Wikipedia, and not allow your kids to access it.

reply

The opposite happens even more often and blatantly, leftists censoring right wing perspectives

about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful -2 Helpful Report as spam

Wikipedia is my go-to place when starting to learn about anything, and it has served as an amazing reference for a number of years. I can easily get lost reading through pages for hours and hours on end.

reply
about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful -3 Helpful Report as spam

The Most Beloved Organized Information I Can See!

reply
about Wikipedia · · Helpful Not helpful -4 Helpful Report as spam

Wikipedia has evolved into a great place to research and use as a reference.

reply